North Carolina’s Supreme Court Elections Could Determine the Future of Voting Rights in This State.

This week, the American Independent released a series of articles outlining the critical importance of North Carolina’s Supreme Court elections in determining the future of voting rights in North Carolina. The series also takes note of dark money from organizations with ties to Senate Leader Berger being funneled into Trey Allen’s Supreme Court campaign and the “glaring” conflict of interest presented by Berger’s son, Justice Phil Berger Jr., sitting on cases where his father is listed as a defendant.

Key Point: “For the past several years, the state's highest court has prevented some Republican lawmakers' ploys from taking permanent partisan control of the state Legislature, including ongoing attempts to gerrymander and disenfranchise many of the state's Black voters.”

Read more on this article series on the critical importance of NC’s Supreme Court election:

American Independent: How North Carolina's Supreme Court election could determine the future of voting rights

American Independent: The dark money network backing a conservative North Carolina Supreme Court candidate

American Independent: The North Carolina Supreme Court has a glaring conflict of interest problem